SIGMUND SCHY, APPELLANT,
v.
MARTIN Z. MARGULIES, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1981-12-08
No. 80-2460
Before HUBBART, C. J., and HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
407 So. 2d 267 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge correctly concluded that an agreement to pay the appellant Schy a “finder’s fee” for locating realty to be purchased by the appellee was invalid and unenforceable because Schy was not a licensed real estate broker or salesman. Sections 475.41, 475.01(3), Florida Statutes (1979); First Equity Corp. of Florida v. Riverside Real Estate Investment Trust, 307 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 316 So. 2d 287 (Fla.1975).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hardcastle Pointe Corp. v. Harlan Cohen, 505 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
    …. Alligood v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 156 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963) (Services need not be couched in terms of a typical real estate contract to be under section 475, court found telephone soliciting included); see also Schy v. Margulies, 407 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (agreement to pay a finder’s fee was included under the statute). Contrary to section 475.41, Florida Statutes (1983), the first paragraph of the con [*1384] tract was actually for a commission or compensation for brokerage servi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw