JEFFREY J. SCHWARTZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE BABCOCK COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, STATE OF FLORIDA, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Webb v. Priest, 413 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …e certified questions in Webb’s motion to compel discovery and to any questions otherwise permissible which would have indicated that a defendant thought or would claim that another defendant caused Webb’s injuries. See, e.g., Frantz v. Golebiewski, 407 So. 2d 283 (Fla.3d DCA 1981) (discovery of treating physician is not controlled by expert witness discovery rule); Weyant v. Rawlings, 389 So. 2d 710 (Fla.2d DCA 1980) (discovery of expert opinion of treating physician about his knowledge of particular disease…
• Brown v. Brown, 432 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …on of federal rule, it must be assumed that our Supreme Court intended to achieve the same results that would inure under the federal rule); Zuberbuhler v. Division of Administration, 344 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) (same); Frantz v. Golebiewski, 407 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (interpretations of federal rule persuasive in considering its Florida equivalent); Gross v. Franklin, 387 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (decisions and commentaries under federal rule of civil procedure are persuasive guidelines…
• Worley v. Cent. Fla. Young Men's Christian Ass'n, Inc., 228 So. 3d 18 (Fla. 2017)
  …een hired for the purposes of litigation. Treating physicians, however, “[do] not acqüire [their] expert knowledgé for the purpose of litigation, but rather simply--in the course of attempting to make [their] patientfs] well.” Frantz v. Golebiewski, 407 So. 2d 283, 285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Moreover, they “typically testify] ,'.. concerning [their] ... own medical performance on a particular occasion and [do] not opin[e] about the performance of another.” Fittipaldi USA, Inc. v. Castroneves, 905 So. 2d 182, 186…

Authorities Cited

• Fla. State Univ. v. Jenkins, 323 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
• Luzier v. Fla. Dep't OF Commerce, 307 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)