LINDA L. MCGOUGH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a trial judge is not required to instruct the jury on the penalty for a lesser included offense, and failure to do so is harmless error.
The appellant was charged with first-degree murder and requested a jury instruction on the penalty for the offense. The trial judge refused the instru…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Lesser Included Offense cases and more on FLexlaw
DAUKSCH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction of murder in the second degree.
The appellant was charged with murder in the first degree and went to trial on that charge. At trial she requested an instruction be given the jury relating to the penalty she could receive if convicted. The trial judge refused to give the penalty instruction. Tascano v. State, 393 So. 2d 540 (Fla.1980), rehearing denied, Feb. 27, 1981, requires the giving of such an instruction in compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(a):
The presiding judge shall charge the jury only upon the law of the case at the conclusion of argument of counsel and upon request of either the State or the defendant the judge shall include in said charge the maximum and minimum sentences which may be imposed (including probation) for the offense for which the accused is then on trial (emphasis added).
Although our Supreme Court has said a Tascano violation is reversible error we do not believe Tascano applies here. There is no requirement in the law that a trial judge instruct the jury as to the penalty for a lesser included offense.
The failure to give an instruction regarding the penalty for a crime of which the accused was not convicted must be harmless error. See James v. State, 393 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED.
COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Whitaker v. State, 433 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…ich may be imposed for all of the offenses charged. McCampbell v. State, 421 So. 2d 1072 (Fla.1982). But the trial court does not have to give an instruction on penalties for lesser included offenses of the greater offense charged. McGough v. State, 407 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), rev. denied, 413 So. 2d 876 (Fla.1982), cert. denied,U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 72, 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982); Lewis v. State, 399 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), aff’d on other grounds, 419 So. 2d 337 (Fla.1982); Williams v. State, 399 So. 2…
Authorities Cited
- Tascano v. State, 393 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1980)
- James v. State, 393 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)