ROACH
v.
MINSHALL ET AL.
It appearing to the court upon a consideration of this case that a jury was waived and' the cause tried to the court, that there was only a general finding and judgment in favor of appellees, that there was no request for any special findings of fact, and of course no exception for a failure to find specific facts, that there was no proposition of law presented to the court by motion for judgment with request for a ruling thereon, and that there is therefore no reviewable question presented in the record [see Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 356, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed. 624; Lewellyn, Collector, v. Electric Reduction Co., 275 U.S. 243, 248, 48 S.Ct. 63, 72 L.Ed. 262; Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494, 45 S.Ct. 175, 69 L.Ed. 401; Ocean Acc. & Guarantee Corp. v. Pearson, 37 F.(2d) 896 (C.C.A. 6); Fordson Coal Co. v. Wilson, 39 F.(2d) 55 (C.C.A. 6); May v. Marbury, 39 F.(2d) 438 (C.C.A. 6); Wynne v. Fries, 50 F.(2d) 761 (C.C.A. 6); Brown v. Harvey Coal Corp., 61 F.(2d) 624 (C.C.A. 6) ; Rose v. United States, 69 F.(2d) 966 (C.C.A. 6); Humphreys v. Third National Bank, 75 F. 852, 855 (C.C.A. 6)],
It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be, and the same is, affirmed.
Judgment of District Court affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mass. Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Preferred Auto. Ins. Co., 110 F.2d 764 (6th Cir. 1940)
Authorities Cited
- Fleischmann Constr. Co. v. United States to the Use of Forsberg, 270 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1926)
- LAW v. United States, 266 U.S. 494 (U.S. 1925)
- Lewellyn v. Elec. Reduction Co., 275 U.S. 243 (U.S. 1927)
- Ocean Accident & Guar. Corp. v. Pearson, 37 F.2d 896 (6th Cir. 1930)
- Wynne v. Fries, 50 F.2d 761 (6th Cir. 1931)
- MAY v. Marbury, 39 F.2d 438 (6th Cir. 1930)
- Brown v. Harvey Coal Corp., 61 F.2d 624 (6th Cir. 1932)
- Rose v. United States, 69 F.2d 966 (6th Cir. 1934)
- Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 69 F.2d 966 (2d Cir. 1934)
- Fordson Coal Co. v. Wilson, 39 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1930)