KLINELINE
v.
UNITED STATES
KLINELINE
UNITED STATES
85 F.2d 628
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1936)
Caution
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
There being no reviewable question presented on the record in this cause because the appellants neither requested findings of fact or conclusions of law on the trial of the case nor excepted to any finding or conclusion made by the trial court [Oyler v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 16 F.(2d) 455 (C.C.A.6); Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 30 F.(2d) 97 (C.C.A.6); United States v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co., 32 F.(2d) 887, 889 (C.C.A.6); Union Bleachery v. United States, 79 F.(2d) 549, 102 A.L.R. 204 (C.C.A.4)], it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Hanovia Chem. & MFG. Co. v. David Buttrick Co., 127 F.2d 888 (1st Cir. 1942)
-
Ralph N. Brodie Co. v. Hydraulic Press MFG. Co., 151 F.2d 91 (9th Cir. 1945)
-
Stuart Oxygen Co. v. Josephian, 162 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1947)
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Oyler v. Cleveland, 16 F.2d 455 (6th Cir. 1926)
- Union Bleachery v. United States, 79 F.2d 549 (4th Cir. 1935)
- Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 30 F.2d 97 (6th Cir. 1928)
- United States v. New York, 32 F.2d 887 (6th Cir. 1929)