IN THE INTEREST OF W. L. F., A CHILD
IN THE INTEREST OF W. L. F., A CHILD
408 So. 2d 1089
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief consistent with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have carefully reviewed the record and the brief filed on behalf of the appellant and find that there is substantial competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment. See, Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120 (Fla.1981). Accordingly, the judgment and conviction is affirmed and counsel for the appellant’s motion to withdraw is granted.
LETTS, C. J., and HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elwira Tarnawski v. Janusz Tarnawski, 851 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…use of the marital home is awarded to the party having primary physical custody of a minor child, see Zeller v. Zeller, 396 So. 2d 1177, 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), compelling financial reasons may necessitate the sale of the home. See Scott v. Scott, 408 So. 2d 1089, 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). On remand, the court will have to reconsider this issue, as well as the equitable distribution, depending upon the court’s valuation of the marital assets. Based upon the reversal of the financial awards, we also [*243] rev…
-
Poppe v. Poppe, 412 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…l assistance to regain a useful and constructive role in society. In the absence of a need for vocational or other training, she is not entitled to receive rehabilitative alimony. Mertz v. Mertz, 287 So. 2d 691 (Fla.2d DCA 1974); see Scott v. Scott, 408 So. 2d 1089 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); Kellner v. Kellner, 388 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Mrs. Poppe received a half interest in the parties’ real and personal property and is self-supporting. Her husband is responsible for one son’s college expenses along with…
-
Vega v. Vega, 877 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Gomez v. Gomez, 659 So. 2d 705, 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (excessive imputation of income; award exceeds ability to pay); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 427 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (reversing under Parham and Blum,); Scott v. Scott, 408 So. 2d 1089, 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (excessive awards); Blum v. Blum, 382 So. 2d 52, 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (award left husband $50 per week). It is axiomatic that the court must set an award which the payor has the ability to pay, and is as fair as possible t…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Delbert Lee Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 1981)