PAUL CECIL, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
PAUL CECIL, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
85 F.2d 1010
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1936)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause was heard on the transcript of the record and was argued by counsel, and it appearing that the record presents no reviewable question, Rose v. U. S., 69 F.(2d) 966 (C.C.A.6),
*1011It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 94 F.2d 138 (9th Cir. 1937)
-
Clark v. Lindemann & Hoverson Co., 88 F.2d 59 (7th Cir. 1937)
Authorities Cited
- Rose v. United States, 69 F.2d 966 (6th Cir. 1934)
- Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 69 F.2d 966 (2d Cir. 1934)