UNITED STATES EX REL. NARDONE
v.
KELLY, MARSHAL, ET AL.
Identification of the appellant as the person named in the indictment was sufficiently established by testimony independent of the testimony received and obtained through wire tapping. Probable cause was shown by the introduction into evidence of a certified copy of the indictment. We express'no opinion as to the competency of the additional evidence of identification received by reason of tapping telephone wires and hearing the voice and conversation of the appellant. The effect upon the competency of this evidence by reason of section 605, title 47 U.S.C. (47 U.S. C.A. § 605), we need not consider. There was sufficient identification without this evidence.
Order affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Neely v. United States, 115 F.2d 448 (4th Cir. 1940)
-
United States v. Pastell, 91 F.2d 575 (4th Cir. 1937)
-
Ball v. United States, 101 F.2d 272 (6th Cir. 1939)
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence