JOHN T. SNELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
v.
IRVINE AND DENSLER, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this writ of error from a Madison County Circuit Court judgment on an open account, the Florida Supreme Court reversed because the clerk failed to properly assess damages following a default judgment. The court held that statutes requiring examination of the plaintiff under oath or affidavit proof before entering final judgment on open accounts were not satisfied by merely filing an unsworn account with the declaration.
The court held that statutes governing default judgments on open accounts require the party to produce and file evidence through examination under oath or affidavit after entry of default, just as written instrument cases require production of the instrument. An unsworn account filed with the declaration is insufficient, and the record must show the basis of judgment through proper proof.
“A proper construction of this statute, we think, requires that the party should produce and file the evidence upon which the damages are to be assessed where the action is upon an open account in the same way as he is required to do in an action upon a written instrument, that is in the regular method after entry or default.”
Establishes the core holding that open account cases require the same methodical production of evidence after default as written instrument cases.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff sued defendant on an open account using attachment proceedings based on an affidavit. After the defendant failed to appear, the court entere…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Default Judgment Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court for Madison County. The action was assumpsit upon an open account. An attachment was issued in the case based upon affidavit. The summons was returnable to the first Monday of December, 1878. On that day a declaration was filed and a default was entered for want of appearance. An account unsworn to, marked exhibit A, was filed with the declaration. On the 13th day of December a final judgment was ‘ entered. No affidavit or other proof appears to have been ■ filed or taken bn that day or upon any day subsequent to the default. The record recites simply, “the plaintiffs having produced their cause of action and the‘damages having been duly assessed by the clerk at one hundred forty 8-100 dollars, it is considered,” &c. This was the amount of the unsworn account filed with the declaration as well as the debt sworn to in vthe affidavit accompanying the attachment proceedings. It does not appear from this record how and in what manner the clerk assessed the damages. The record recites a simple production of the cause of action, the unsworn account. The statute provides that upon the entry of any default where "the action is upon a written instrument for the payment of money, the plaintiff at any time after such default may, on the production and filing of such instrument, cause final judgment to be entered for the amount thereof with interest, and' the clerk ’ shall assess,” &c.» "And if the action is upon an open account or other contract for the payment of money not in writing, upon the ontoy of a default as aforesaid the clerk shall ascertain the amount which the plaintiff is entitled to recover ■ in such action from the examination of the 'plaintiff under oath, or othér proofs by affidavit or otherwise, and enter up the judgment for the amount so assessed or ascertained.”
A proper construction of this statute, we think, requires that the party should produce and file the evidence upon which' the damages are to be assessed where the action is. upon an open account in the same way as he is required to do in an action upon a written instrument, that is in the regular method after entry or default. The statute does .not in terms prescribe the method by which the clerk shall "ascertain” the amount, but we think the Legislature contemplated the same method in each case, and we think this the correct construction of the section of the statute. In this case there was nothing filed, and looking to the pro-' ceedings subsequent to the entry of the default, we cannot say that the clerk assessed the damages otherwise than by reference to the open account filed with the declaration. "We think the record should show the basis of the judgment — the production and filing of the proof after default entered. Nothing of the kind appears here.
The judgment is reversed and the case will be' remanded ‘ to stand upon the default for want of an appearance.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Parker v. Dekle, 46 Fla. 452 (Fla. 1903)…idence dehors the contract sued upon is necessary to ascertain the amount to be re [*457] covered, the clerk has no authority to entertain such evidence or to found a final judgment thereon.” Also see Blount v. Gallaher, 22 Fla. 92; Snell v. Irvine, 17 Fla. 234; Coons v. Harlee, Id. 484; Ropes v. Snyder Harris Bassett Co., 37 Fla. 529, 20 South. Rep. 535. And “upon a hearing in damages, after the overruling of a demurrer, the case stands with reference to the evidence necessary for the plaintiff and admiss…
-
Sons v. Davidson, 35 Fla. 342 (Fla. 1895)…the-regularity of the proceedings leading up to such final judgment, and to set aside and vacate the same, unless the judgment itself was void upon its face? We do-not think the judgment here is void upon its face. In the cases of Snell vs. Irvine, 17 Fla. 234, and Blount vs. Gallaher, 22 Fla. 92, this court held that the final judgment entered by the clerk on an open account, upon a default, should show what evidence was produced by the plaintiff to enable the clerk to ascertain and assess the damage, an…1 / 2
-
The Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Porter, 44 Fla. 568 (Fla. 1902)…is settled here that the authority of the clerk of the Circuit Court to enter, final judgments consequent upon defaults is derived entirely from the statute, and the statute must be strictly pursued. Blount v. Gallaher, 22 Fla. 92; Snell v. Irvine, 17 Fla. 234; Coons v. Harllee, 17 Fla. 484; Ropes v. Snyder Harris Bassett Co. 37 Fla. 529, 20 South. Rep. 535. The statute, section 1035, Revised Statutes, that gives authority to clerks to enter final judgments, contemplates that the clerk can enter a final j…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence