IN RE DODGE. CIERI
v.
DODGE
IN RE DODGE. CIERI
DODGE
86 F.2d 259
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1936)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
For tlie reasons stated at the argument this order must be affirmed. The case did not raise the question of the effect of the discharge upon the appellant’s judgment and the district court should not have discussed it. It is impossible to reverse an opinion, but we take this occasion to declare that it was extrajudicial, and that it should not be regarded as authoritative for any purpose whatever.
Order affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hertz v. Consolidated Fisheries, 213 F.2d 801 (9th Cir. 1954)
-
Cities Serv. OIL Co. v. M/S Melvin H. Baker, 384 F.2d 911 (3d Cir. 1967)