NATHANIEL WATTS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Nathaniel Watts appeals the revocation of his probation after his trial court refused to continue the hearing to allow his retained counsel to appear, instead forcing him to accept representation from the public defender's office. The appellate court reverses, holding that the trial court violated Watts' right to effective assistance of counsel by failing to ensure his retained attorney could represent him at the critical probation revocation hearing.
The trial court violated Watts' right to effective assistance of counsel. A probation revocation hearing is a critical stage where a probationer has the right to counsel. Once the court was notified that Watts had retained counsel who agreed to represent him, the court had a duty to ascertain whether he was actually represented by that attorney. The court's failure to do so, and its appointment of an unprepared public defender as a substitute, did not cure the constitutional error.
[1] A probation revocation hearing is a critical stage in a criminal proceeding.
[2] A probationer facing revocation proceedings has a right to counsel.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A hearing for violation of probation is a critical stage in a proceeding against a defendant.”
Establishes that probation revocation hearings trigger heightened constitutional protections, including the right to counsel
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWatts pled guilty to unarmed robbery in one case and burglary/grand theft in another, receiving five-year concurrent probation sentences. After his ar…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Critical Stage Of Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
SCHOONOVER, Judge.
The appellant, Nathaniel Watts, has appealed the judgments and sentences entered against him by the trial court. The court’s action was the result of a revocation of probation hearing held over the appellant’s objection after his retained counsel did not appear at the hearing. We reverse.
These are consolidated appeals from two criminal cases involving the appellant. In one case, he pled guilty to unarmed robbery. In the other, he pled guilty to burglary of a conveyance and grand theft. He was placed on five years probation on each of the charges. The three sentences were to be served concurrently.
After the appellant was arrested for involuntary sexual battery, warrants charging him with violating six conditions of his probation were issued.
On the day of the probation revocation hearing, the appellant informed the court that he had retained private counsel. He stated the attorney had visited him the preceding day and agreed to be in court for the hearing. The court refused to continue the hearing to allow the appellant to contact his attorney and made no effort to have him contacted by anyone else. Instead, the appellant was informed that he would have to accept the representation of the public defender’s office. The assistant public defender and the appellant informed the court that there had been no prior contact between them and that they had not discussed the case. The hearing was held over the appellant’s objection, and at its conclusion, the appellant was found guilty of violating his probation. He was immediately adjudicated guilty and sentenced to serve a total of twenty-five years in the state prison.
The appellant contends that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We agree.
A hearing for violation of probation is a critical stage in a proceeding against a defendant. Gleichauf v. State, 334 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
This court has held that a probationer faced with revocation proceedings has the right to counsel at those proceedings. Van Cleaf v. State, 328 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).
We realize the trial court has an interest in bringing matters before it to a speedy determination. However, under the facts of this case, the probationer’s interest in retaining his liberty far outweighed the court’s interest.
Once the court was notified that the appellant had a private attorney who had agreed to represent him, it had the duty to ascertain if the appellant was in fact represented by that attorney. Baker v. Wainwright, 527 F. 2d 372, 375 (5th Cir. 1976). Its failure to do so resulted in the denial of the appellant’s right to effective assistance of counsel.
The trial court’s error was not made harmless by appointing the public defender to represent the appellant. He had the right to be represented by his own attorney. § 948.06, Fla.Stat. (1979).
We accordingly reverse and remand for proceedings consistent herewith.
RYDER, A. C. J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Grier v. State, 424 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…violations alleged in the affidavit or if other substantial complicated reasons require counsel. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973); Van Cleaf v. State, 328 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); see also Watts v. State, 409 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). In the instant case, appellant denied committing the alleged burglaries and, therefore, competent counsel was required at the hearing. In a motion for post-conviction relief, an aggrieved defendant need only show that the court-…
Authorities Cited
- van Cleaf v. State, 328 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
- Baker v. Louie L. Wainwright, 527 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1976)
- Gleichauf v. State, 334 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)