CINCINNATI, NEWPORT & COVINGTON RAILWAY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, RUSSELL WILSON, MAYOR OF CINCINNATI, CLARENCE A. DYKSTRA, CITY MANAGER OF CINCINNATI, AND JOHN D. ELLIS, CITY ATTORNEY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEES
CINCINNATI, NEWPORT & COVINGTON RAILWAY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
CITY OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, RUSSELL WILSON, MAYOR OF CINCINNATI, CLARENCE A. DYKSTRA, CITY MANAGER OF CINCINNATI, AND JOHN D. ELLIS, CITY ATTORNEY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEES
90 F.2d 1003
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1937)
Opinion of the Court
This cause was heard on the transcript and briefs and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged that the decree of the District Court dismissing the bill in equity be and the same is affirmed, upon the authority of City of Covington, Ky. v. Cincinnati, N. & C. Ry. Co., 71 F.(2d) 117; and Cincinnati, N. & C. Ry. Co. v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio, 71 F.(2d) 124.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- City of Covington v. Cincinnati, 71 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1934)
- Cincinnati v. City of Cincinnati, 71 F.2d 124 (6th Cir. 1934)