RODRIGUEZ

v.

AROSEMENA ET AL.

5th Cir. | 1937-07-21

No. 8320

Before FOSTER, HUTCHESON, and HOLMES, Circuit J udges.

91 F.2d 219 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1937) Positive Treatment

Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal to review a judgment of the United States District Court for the Canal Zone overruling a demurrer to the jurisdiction of the court in a suit wherein plaintiffs were seeking to recover possession of some 400 mahogany logs, alleged to be worth $1,000 and for damages in the sum of $500. Plaintiffs move -to dismiss the appeal. Our jurisdiction to review judgments of the United States District Court for the Canal Zone is restrictive to final judgments in cases of this kind. Section 128, Jud.Code, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282 (U.S. 1940)
In re King, 107 F.2d 618 (C.C.P.A. 1939)
In re Smith, 118 F.2d 722 (C.C.P.A. 1941)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

RODRIGUEZ v. AROSEMENA ET AL.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

RODRIGUEZ

v.

AROSEMENA ET AL.