CAROL L. CIRIGLIANO, A SINGLE WOMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

DAVID H. SINGER AND SPIEGEL AND SINGER, A PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Acquisition Corp. OF Am. & Kenneth v. Hemmerle, Sr., 543 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …o add a new party defendant to a claim to conform to the evidence. When a codefendant is sued on a cross-claim, service of summons is required. Elliot Enterprises, Inc. v. Serota, 436 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Fundaro v. Canadiana Corporation, 409 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Clearly, this was not done here. While we note that the recent amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.170(g), effective January 1, 1989, eliminates the requirement of issuance of a summons to serve a cross-claim where th…
• Keithie's Roofing Co. Inc. v. LEE Parks Apts., Inc., 461 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …llee’s cross-claim was invalid for lack of jurisdiction over the person because Keithie’s was not served with process on the cross-claim as required. Elliott Enterprises, Inc. v. Serota, 436 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Fundaro v. Canadiana Corp., 409 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Accordingly, the order under review denying Keithie’s motion pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540 to vacate the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.…
• Bailey v. Scutieri, 759 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
  …ives all challenges to service of process or jurisdiction. See Babcock v. Whatmore, 707 So. 2d 702 (Fla.1998); Sternberg v. Sternberg, 139 Fla. 219, 190 So. 486 (1939); Hager v. Illes, 431 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Fundaro v. Canadiana Corp., 409 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Royal Indus., Inc. v. Birdsong, 340 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Krasnosky v. Krasnosky, 282 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). By filing pleadings for affirmative relief while this cause was pending in the federal court, and ac…

Authorities Cited

• Julia Slocum and Homer v. Slocum, 100 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1958)