WESLEY H. LITTLE, A/K/A WESLEY HUGH LITTLE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Taylor v. State, 855 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2003)
  …See Kerlin v. State, 352 So. 2d 45, 52 (Fla.1977) (“Waiver occurs by failure to assert the privilege by objection or a voluntary revelation by the holder of the communication, or a material part thereof.”); see also Hamilton v. Hamilton Steel Corp., 409 So. 2d 1111, 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (“[0]nce the privilege is waived, and the horse out of the barn, it cannot be rein-voked.”). However, defense counsel’s subsequent objection revoked any implicit waiver regarding farther testimony about privileged matters.2…
• Abamar Hous. & Dev., Inc. v. Lisa Daly Lady Decor, Inc., 698 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …documents. Cf. Stevenson v. Stevenson, 661 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)(secretary’s confirmation to opposing counsel, pursuant to agreement, that documents were signed constitutes purposeful waiver of privilege); Hamilton v. Hamilton Steel Corp., 409 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)(privilege waived when counsel for eodefendants announced settlement in court once clients dispute terms of settlement among themselves). Section 90.507, Florida Statutes (1995), codifies this precept by specifying that voluntary…
• Berkeley v. Eisen, 699 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …isclosed the names of its clients. Assuming, as Berkeley argues, that its client lists are trade secrets and proprietary business data, those privileges would have been waived by Berkeley’s voluntary disclosure. See Hamilton v. Hamilton Steel Corp., 409 So. 2d 1111, 1113 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). However, we reject the Eisens’ argument that there has been a waiver of the non-parties’ privacy rights by virtue of Berkeley’s disclosure of their names. The privacy rights are the clients’— not Berkeley’s. There is no i…