ARTHUR T. COLES, APPELLANT,
v.
GAINESVILLE BONDED WAREHOUSE AND AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this workers' compensation appeal, the court reversed the deputy commissioner's calculation of an independent contractor truck driver's average weekly wage, holding that the statutory formula under Florida law must be used rather than reliance on the claimant's testimony about monthly earnings, and remanded for proper recomputation of business expenses.
The court held that where a claimant has been employed regularly for thirteen weeks prior to a compensable accident, his average weekly wage must be computed pursuant to Section 440.14(1)(a) regardless of whether the claimant was in a slack or busy period, and the deputy commissioner erred in relying on the claimant's testimony about 1977 monthly earnings rather than applying the statutory formula to the thirteen-week period preceding the accident.
[1] An average weekly wage for a worker's compensation claimant regularly employed for thirteen weeks prior to a compensable accident must be computed pursuant to the statuto…
[2] Payments made toward the lease-purchase of a truck are considered business expenses, not wages, for the purpose of calculating a claimant's average weekly wage in a worke…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Where a claimant has been employed regularly for thirteen weeks prior to his compensable accident, his or her average weekly wage for that period shall be computed pursuant to Section 440.14(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1977).”
Establishes the mandatory statutory method for calculating average weekly wage in workers' compensation cases
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceArthur Coles, an independent contractor truck driver employed by Gainesville Bonded Warehouse, suffered a compensable back and neck injury on July 7, …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Business Expense Deduction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Among the several issues presented in this worker’s compensation appeal, claimant contends that the deputy commissioner erred in setting his average weekly wage at $250 per week. We agree and reverse.
The facts underlying this appeal are somewhat unusual. When claimant suffered a compensable injury to his back and neck on July 7,1977, he was employed as an independent contractor truck driver for Gainesville Bonded Warehouse, a furniture-moving common carrier. Despite his status, he was covered by worker’s compensation insurance.
As an independent contractor, claimant did not receive a straight salary. Rather, as both he and his employer agree, claimant’s “wages” were determined by deducting his various business expenses from his gross receipts. In the three months prior to his accident, claimant’s trucking operation grossed $13,616.16. During this period he made payments of $755 per month toward the lease-purchase of his tractor-trailer; his fuel and repair bills amounted to $2,130.68; and, his payments to his co-driver amounted to $2,800. Subtracting these deductions from his gross receipts leaves a net of $6,520.48. Claimant also indicated that he spent approximately $20 per day on the road for his personal expenses. Just how many days he spent on the road during this thirteen-week period is not clear from this record; however, he did indicate that the more he drove, the more he earned.
During the course of his deposition testimony claimant indicated that, for the year of 1977, he had an average net per month of approximately $1,000. Apparently relying upon this testimony, the deputy commissioner set the claimant’s average weekly wage at $250 per week.
Where a claimant has been employed regularly for thirteen weeks prior to his compensable accident, his or her average weekly wage for that period shall be computed pursuant to Section 440.14(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1977). Silver Springs, Inc. v. Scardo, 408 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Adams v. Florida Industrial Commission, 110 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). This particular method of computation must be used regardless, of whether the claimant is working during a slack or busy period of time. See Waymire v. Florida Industrial Commission, 174 So. 2d 404 (Fla.1965). Therefore, the deputy has erroneously relied upon the claimant’s testimony regarding his monthly wages for 1977, especially since the record indicates that he was unable to work at his usual pace after the accident. We therefore must remand this cause for a recomputation of the claimant’s average weekly wage pursuant to Section 440.14(1)(a). In view of the ambiguity in the record regarding the exact nature and amount of the claimant’s business expenses, particularly concerning his personal expenses for the days that he was on the road, the deputy shall hold hearings, receive evidence, and make such-additional findings as may be necessary to establish the claimant’s business expenses and thereby appropriately determine his average weekly wage. In this context, however, we note that claimant’s payments toward the lease-purchase of his truck shall be considered business expenses, and not wages.
We have considered claimant’s argument for additional temporary total disability benefits and find it to be without merit. However, upon remand his attorney’s fees shall be recomputed in light of any increased benefits which he may receive.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Apholz v. N. Am. van Lines & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 427 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…NTON, Judge. As the sole issue presented in this appeal, claimant contends the deputy commissioner erred in setting his average weekly wage at $581.40. We agree and reverse. This case is remarkably similar to Coles v. Gainesville Bonded Warehouse, 409 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), on which we rely for our holding. As happened in Coles, claimant herein suffered a compensable injury to his back on August 16, 1979, while employed as an independent contractor truck driver for North American Van Lines, a furni…
-
City OF Hialeah & Alexsis, Inc. v. Jimenez, 527 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…lorida Statutes, the deputy utilized claimant’s net earnings after deducting business expenses. This methodology has been approved in Apholz v. North American Van Lines, 427 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and Coles v. Gainesville Bonded Warehouse, 409 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). While Apholz and Coles involved claimants working as independent contractors after their industry injuries, the rationale of those cases is likewise applicable to the self-employed claimant in the present case. The deputy proper…
-
Fla. Timber Prods. v. Felton Williams, 459 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…t. In her order she ruled that only the actual proven business expenses during the 13-week period preceding the accident should be deducted from claimant’s gross income in order to arrive at the AWW. Relying on Coles v. Gainesville Bonded Warehouse, 409 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and Apholz v. North American Van Lines, 427 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) she placed the value of the use of all of claimant’s equipment at only $29 per week, which was the amount claimant actually paid' out for the equipment…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Silver Springs, Inc. v. Candy Scardo, 408 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Ray v. Waymire, 174 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1965)
- McKIBBEN v. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co., 110 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
- Nica B. Adams v. Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 110 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)