JAMES PEARSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pearson v. State, 660 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …PER CURIAM. In Pearson v. State, 410 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), this court held that Pearson’s thirty-year sentence for attempted burglary of an occupied dwelling with intent to commit assault exceeded the statutory maximum for that crime. Pearson now alleges, by way of a motion to correct i…
• MID Valley, Inc. v. Ackel, 411 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …eputy imposed the transcript cost on the carrier ostensibly as a sanction for this non-appearance. It is incorrect to impose sanctions for failure to attend any chapter 440 proceeding except a pretrial conference. See Chittick v. Eastern Air Lines, 410 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). However, we decline to disturb the deputy’s conclusion, in effect, that the carrier should pay for a share of the transcript cost. Indeed, it is appellants who argue that the deputy did just this. The notice of hearing sent to…
• Smith v. DRW Realty Servs. & Aetna Life & Cas., 578 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …e is no evidence that the E/C had requested a subpoena to compel claimant’s attendance or that the E/C requested a continuance. No law has been cited to show that the claimant’s presence at the hearing was required. Cf. Chittick v. Eastern Airlines, 410 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (held it was improper to dismiss claim for attorney’s failure to appear; nothing requires party or his attorney to attend chapter 440 proceeding). There is no support for the JCC’s finding that proceeding with the hearing in the…