MOORE DRY DOCK CO.
v.
PILLSBURY ET AL.
This is an appeal from an order refusing an application for an interlocutory injunction. The order was entered on June 10, 1937. This appeal was taken on June 25, 1937. Thereafter the case proceeded to final hearing, and on November 22, 1937, the District Court entered a final decree dismissing the bill of complaint. An appeal from the final decree was taken on February 1, 1938, and is now pending in this court. Hence, the first. mentioned appeal should be dismissed. Sterling v. Constantin, 287 U.S. 378, 386, 53 S.Ct. 190, 191, 77 L.Ed. 375; Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission, 286 U.S. 210, 224, 52 S.Ct. 559, 561, 76 L.Ed. 1062, 86 A.L.R. 403; Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kuykendall, 265 U.S. 196, 205, 44 S.Ct. 553, 556, 68 L.Ed. 975; Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 44, 40 S.Ct. 221, 222, 64 L.Ed. 445.
Appeal dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. City OF Chicago, 534 F.2d 708 (7th Cir. 1976)
-
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Okin, 137 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1943)
-
Peterson v. Brotherhood OF Locomotive Firemen AND Enginemen, 268 F.2d 567 (7th Cir. 1959)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Champlin Ref. Co. v. Corp. Comm'n of Okla., 286 U.S. 210 (U.S. 1932)
- Sterling v. Constantin, 287 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1932)
- Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37 (U.S. 1920)
- Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Kuykendall, 265 U.S. 196 (U.S. 1924)