CITY OF HALLANDALE, APPELLANT,

v.

ACMAR ENGINEERING CORP., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Sec. Mgmt. Corp. v. Markham, 516 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …vise the owner of any defects in them. The final judgment provided that appellants would have forty-five days after notice of any such defects to cure them. The city appealed and this court affirmed the final judgment in City of Hallandale v. Acmar, 410 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). In April, 1982, the city rejected appellants’ plans for construction of the 1,500-unit project and informed appellants: If you wish to submit further plans for construction on the subject site, you must do so in accordance with…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• City OF Hallandale v. Acmar Eng'g Corp., 560 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
  …LETTS, Judge. Pursuant to a trial court’s order in 1981 which we affirmed on appeal, City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp., 410 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), the city was ordered to approve the developer’s building plans for a 1,500 condominium unit project, and issue a building permit as per the building and zoning regulations in force in 1969. For one reason or another, the develop…
• Rinker Materials Corp. & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hill, 469 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …t due to his orthopedic condition and the testimony of Dr. Gilbert, a psychiatrist, that claimant has a 15% permanent partial impairment based on his psychiatric condition. The employer and carrier rely on Florida Department of Corrections v. Carro, 410 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), to support their contention that the deputy erred in granting a permanent partial disability rating in excess of claimant’s 15% orthopedic impairment rating given by Dr. Ticktin. They argue that under section 440.25(3)(b), Flori…