KENNETH WEBB, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH WEBB, SR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
410 So. 2d 669
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order revoking Webb’s probation for violating condition (5) but remand with directions to strike the finding that he also violated condition (6) because that finding does not conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing. See Sampson v. State, 375 So. 2d 325 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Brouillett v. State, 373 So. 2d 449 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).
DANAHY, A. C. J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edwards v. State, 422 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)…ipality may enact legislation concerning any subject except for those areas “expressly preempted” by the constitution or state law. An “express” reference is one which is distinctly stated and not left to inference. Pierce v. Division of Retirement, 410 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). There is no suggestion of a constitutional preemption, and neither the language of the legislative findings of fact nor the terminology of chapter 893, Florida Statutes (1981), expressly preempts the field of drug abuse control.…
Authorities Cited
- Sterling Sampson v. State, 375 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Brouillett v. State, 373 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Bloyd v. State, 373 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)