MINNESOTA MINING & MFG. CO.
v.
COE
MINNESOTA MINING & MFG. CO.
COE
100 F.2d 432
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1938)
Caution
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion case to Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe, 69 App.D.C. 256, 100 F.2d 429, No. 6940, decided this day. The application for reissue herein, involved claims for the waterproof sheet abrasive material itself — whereas the application in No. 6940 involved process claims. The decree of the lower court in this case must be affirmed for the reasons set forth in our opinion in No. 6940. Consequently, it is not necessary for us to consider the additional objections urged by the Commissioner against the claims here in issue, or the procedural questions presented by appellant in response thereto.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kenney v. Honorable Raymond W. FOX, 232 F.2d 288 (6th Cir. 1956)
-
Fletcher v. Bryan, 175 F.2d 716 (4th Cir. 1949)
-
De Busk v. Harvin, 212 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1954)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Minn. Mining & MFG. Co. v. COE, 100 F.2d 429 (D.C. Cir. 1938)