THELMA G. KRUTEL, APPELLANT,
v.
IRVING G. KRUTEL, APPELLEE
THELMA G. KRUTEL, APPELLANT,
IRVING G. KRUTEL, APPELLEE
411 So. 2d 318
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The final judgment of dissolution is affirmed on the grounds that (a) the record clearly demonstrates that the parties stipulated to the matters now appealed, Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank, 252 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1971); Dorson v. Dorson, 393 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Groover v. Groover, 383 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Behar v. Southeast Banks Trust Co., N.A., 374 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So. 2d 202 (Fla.1980); Barr v. Ehrlich, 301 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Curr v. Helene Transportation Corp., 287 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), and (b) no error or abuse of the trial court’s discretion has been shown, Canakaris v. Ganakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dickerson v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Capitol Holding Agency Grp., Inc., 646 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…ployment compensation benefits. Those cases in which unauthorized absences from work have been held to be misconduct are based on facts far more egregious than those presented here. For instance, in Sanchez v. Dep’t of Labor and Employment Security, 411 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), Sanchez’s failure to report to work because of non-emergency sinus surgery was accompanied by Sanchez’s repeated inability to report for work promptly and frequent verbal altercations with other employees. In Washington v. Burdin…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. The Dania Bank, 252 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1971)
- Dorson v. Gertrude Dorson, 393 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- Behar v. Se. Banks Tr. Co., 374 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Mershon v. Buckles-Thompson, Inc., 383 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Curr v. Helene Transp. Corp., 287 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
- Barr v. Rae Ehrlich, 301 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)