KENNETH EUGENE HOKE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH EUGENE HOKE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
411 So. 2d 372
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of State v. Ricano, 393 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA), appeal dismissed, 402 So. 2d 612, (Fla.1981); State v. Goodley, 381 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Mata v. State, 380 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA), petition for review denied, 389 So. 2d 1112 (Fla.1980).
ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., and MINER, CHARLES E., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dodds v. State, 434 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)…e stop of Dodds’ vehicle was improper and his arrest was illegal because the officers lacked probable cause. We have recently discussed the arrest powers of the officers of the Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission in our opinion in State v. Howard, 411 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). In Howard we construed. Section 372.07(1), Florida Statutes (1979) as an expansion of the wildlife officers’ power to make arrests for violations of the laws of this State when committed on the lands under their supervision. How…
-
State v. Parsons, 549 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…urn only to the marine statutes set out in the earlier subsections of 370.021 and has no reference to traffic infractions which may occur on any street or highway in our state. Cf. Dodds v. State, 434 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); State v. Howard, 411 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), review denied, 421 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1982). [*765] We certify to the Supreme Court of Florida that this cause involves the following question which is of great public importance: Do officers of the Florida Marine Patrol have aut…
-
Amison v. State, 5 So. 3d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…sts by wildlife officers use the same laws generally applicable to law enforcement officers. See, e.g., State v. Bell, 873 So. 2d 476, 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing the Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.161, Florida Statutes (2001)); State v. Howard, 411 So. 2d 372, 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (citing section 901.15, governing lawful arrest without a warrant). To the extent that the State relies on an administrative rule to enlarge the wildlife officer’s authority beyond that granted by statute, we reject such a b…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Goodley, 381 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Mata v. State, 380 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- State v. Ricano, 393 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)