SAMUEL A. NEIDICH, PETITIONER,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT

3d Cir. | 1939-07-14
No. 7086
105 F.2d 1019 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1939)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This case arises out of the same corporate transactions which were before the Court of Claims in Davis v. United States, 26 F.Supp. 1007. It is indistinguishable in principle from Groman v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 82, 58 S.Ct. 108, 82 L.Ed. 63, Helvering v. Bashford, 302 U.S. 454, 58 S.Ct. 307, 82 L.Ed. 367, and Hedden v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 105 F.2d 311. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed upon the authority of those cases.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw