DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF LAKE WORTH AND CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE, INC., APPELLANTS.
v.
FAYE ROBINSON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This workers' compensation appeal addresses whether reimbursement for child care expenses constitutes a covered medical benefit. The court affirmed an award of child care expenses as medically necessary treatment, concluding that placement of the claimant's daughter in nursery school was appropriate to aid the claimant's psychiatric treatment and recovery from a work-related back injury.
The court held that child care expenses may be awarded as a required medical benefit under section 440.13, Florida Statutes, where medically necessary to aid the claimant's treatment and recovery. However, the court cautioned that such awards are limited to cases with circumstances as extreme as those presented here.
[1] Child care expenses may be awarded as a required medical benefit in workers' compensation cases when medically necessary to aid in the claimant's recovery and progress.
[2] A claimant's inability to care for their child due to a compensable injury can be a significant stressor exacerbating a psychiatric condition.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“it was medically necessary for Robinson's daughter to be placed in a nursery school in order to aid her medical recovery and progress and to assess those nursery school expenses against the employer/carrier as a required medical benefit”
The court's holding that child care expenses qualify as compensable medical benefits when medically necessary to aid the claimant's recovery.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFaye Robinson suffered a compensable back injury on October 19, 1978, while lifting a patient at work, diagnosed as a bulging disc with nerve involvem…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Medical Necessity cases and more on FLexlaw
McCORD, Judge.
This is an appeal from a workers’ compensation order awarding to claimant Faye Robinson reimbursement for child care expenses. § 440.13, Fla.Stat. (1977). In view of the unusual nature of this order and the lack of any clear precedential guidance, we find it appropriate to discuss the evidentiary basis of the award.
On October 19, 1978, Robinson suffered a compensable injury to her lower back while attempting to lift a patient at work. Since that time, she has been treated by several physicians, including Dr. Hayslip, a neurosurgeon, who diagnosed her condition as a bulging disc in the spine and nerve root involvement of both the right leg and left arm. Among other things, Dr. Hayslip recommended that Robinson avoid lifting her four-year-old daughter, weighing forty-four pounds, and avoid repetitious bending. Lying in traction was also deemed to be an appropriate therapeutic mode of treatment.
Robinson eventually came under the care of Dr. Blackman, a psychiatrist, for emotional problems that arose as a result of the compensable accident. Blackman diagnosed Robinson as having moderate to severe depressive neurosis, which is manifested by back pain, headaches, and weight gain. This condition is exacerbated by various stressful situations in which Robinson routinely finds herself. One of these stressful situations is presented by the necessity to take care of the needs of her daughter. She testified that her physical condition, including back pain and the necessity to be in traction for six to eight hours a day, caused her to be unable to take care of the needs of her daughter. This inability to meet the normal demands of her child has caused her to become much more nervous and frustrated. Dr. Blackman agreed that Robinson’s continued care for her daughter was a major stress in her life. Thus, he concluded that it would be medically beneficial for the child to be in nursery school in that the removal of the child from the home for several hours per day would lessen the frustrations felt by appellee. This, in turn, would aid in the treatment of her psychiatric condition and facilitate her return to active and fruitful employment.
In light of this factual predicate, we find no error in the deputy’s conclusion that it was medically necessary for Robinson’s daughter to be placed in a nursery school in order to aid her medical recovery and progress and to assess those nursery school expenses against the employer/carrier as a required medical benefit. In reaching this conclusion, we caution against anyone’s misconstruing this opinion as an acceptance of the medical necessity of child care in cases involving circumstances less extreme than those specifically presented here.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr, C. J, and BOOTH, J, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Aino's Custom Slip Covers & Nationwide Ins. Co. v. DeLUCIA, 533 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…1st DCA 1988) (portable hot tub); Butler v. Lanzo Construction Co., 509 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (air conditioning); Sacred Heart Hospital v. Grafton, 451 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (lap pool); Doctors Hospital of Lake Worth v. Robinson, 411 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (child care). Although such awards are permissible, the claimant’s need must be clearly established. If the claimant’s need is readily apparent, nonmedical evidence may provide adequate support for such an award. Fidelity & Casua…
-
Prestressed Decking Corp. & Travelers Ins. Co. v. Edgardo Medrano, 556 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…be institutionalized, awarding counseling services to members of claimant’s family in order to indirectly benefit claimant was beyond the deputy’s authority under Section 440.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes.2 Doctor’s Hospital of Lake Worth v. Robinson, 411 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), does not require a contrary result. Additionally, the record reflects that the deputy should never have considered the issue. Counseling for the wife and family was not raised as an issue in the notice of hearing or pretrial sti…
-
Lundy Stables & CNA Ins. Co. v. Rivers, 562 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…ting the process of recovery, such services were properly awarded under section 440.13, Florida Statutes. See generally, Khawam v. Collision Clinics International Inc., 413 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Doctor’s Hospital of Lake Worth v. Robinson, 411 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). In establishing claimant’s permanent total disability as of the date of accident, the judge applied section 440.15(1)(b), Florida Statutes, which provides that: ... paraplegia ... shall, in the absence of conclusive proof of a…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence