LOIS WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
OSCAR WILLIAMS, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clarification Of Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We disagree with appellant’s contention that the award of a special equity in the “Snowball” house to the appellee-husband is a nullity and must be completely disregarded because paragraph eight of the final judgment, which provides for the special equity, contains no provision concerning the amount of the special equity, nor the manner in which it is to be determined. However, we agree that the award of a special equity which does not clearly specify the amount thereof, nor provide for its determination, is incomplete and that it must be clarified in order to inform the parties of their respective interests, and to facilitate its enforcement. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings, including, in the discretion of the trial judge, the presentation of additional evidence, and the entry of an amended or supplemental final judgment specifying the extent of appel-lee’s special equity.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
MILLS, LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Suco, 521 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1988)…f privacy in the premises searched. Rawlings, 448 U.S. at 104, 100 S.Ct. at 2561; Rakas, 439 U.S. at 152, 99 S.Ct. at 435 (Powell, J., Concurring); Mancusi v. Deforte, 392 U.S. 364, 868, 88 S.Ct. 2120, 2123, 20 L.Ed.2d 1164 (1968); Daniels v. State, 411 So. 2d 1034, 1036 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We agree with the respondent that his status as lessor and his status as invitee are merely factors to be considered in conjunction with all the surrounding circumstances. We also agree that the totality of the circumstan…
-
State v. Suco, 502 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…here is no indication that he was ever in the house or on the premises where the search occurred. We acknowledge, however, that State v. Mallory, 409 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 2d DCA), pet. for review denied, 418 So. 2d 1280 (Fla.1982) and Daniels v. State, 411 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) — both cited with disapproval by 4 W. LaFave, supra, at 294 n. 62, and 300 n. 89 — appear to run contrary to the above legal analysis, although they are factually distinguishable from the instant case. In those cases, unlike the…
-
Hershel Ray Buchanan v. State, 432 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…not agree. Before a defendant can challenge the legality of a search, he must have had a subjective expectation of privacy in the area searched, and that expectation must be one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. Daniels v. State, 411 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Even if Buchanan had formed a subjective expectation of privacy, it was simply unreasonable for him to have done so in a busy hospital emergency room where medical personnel were constantly walking in and out and where he could…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence