NUGENT
v.
PROEL
NUGENT
PROEL
108 F.2d 718
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (1940)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is a suit for personal injuries. When the case was here before, we reversed a judgment for the' plaintiff because on the evidence as we viewed it a verdict for the defendant should have been directed. Proel v. Nugent, 1 Cir., 1938, 97 F.2d 353. Upon retrial of the case, the trial judge concluded that the evidence did not to any considerable extent vary from that presented before, and hence directed a verdict for the defendant in accordance with our previous opinion. We agree with this disposition of the case.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed with costs to the appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fleming v. Palmer, 123 F.2d 749 (1st Cir. 1941)
-
Burgess v. M/V Tamano, 564 F.2d 964 (1st Cir. 1977)
-
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Winslow, 113 F.2d 418 (1st Cir. 1940)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Proel v. Nugent, 97 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1938)