CONSTANTINO CASAL AND OMAR GARCIA, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-04-07
No. 78-2129
Before HUBBART, C. J., and HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
411 So. 2d 1040 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on August 14, 1979 (375 So. 2d 1077, Fla.App.), reversing the final judgments and sentence of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, the Supreme Court of Florida, 410 So. 2d 152 (Fla.), by its opinion and judgment dated January 14, 1982, now lodged in this court, disapproved in part this court’s judgment;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on November 27,1979, is withdrawn, the opinion of this court filed August 14, 1979, is amended in accordance with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. The judgments and sentence of the trial court are reversed and the cause remanded with directions to discharge the defendants. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court. Fla.R. App.P. 9.400(a).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hicks v. State, 424 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1982)
    …[*759] PER CURIAM. Pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, in Hicks v. State, 411 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), certified the following question as having great public importance: May the harmless, error rule be applied where the only penalty instruction requested is for the main offense charged and the defendant is subsequently convict…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw