MARGARET A. RIVERA AND ROGER E. KOPPLOW, AS GUARDIANS OF THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF HILDER F. KOPPLOW, INCOMPETENT, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARGARET A. RIVERA AND ROGER E. KOPPLOW, AS GUARDIANS OF THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF HILDER F. KOPPLOW, INCOMPETENT, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
411 So. 2d 1040
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. No motions for rehearing shall be entertained.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hicks v. State, 424 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1982)…[*759] PER CURIAM. Pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, in Hicks v. State, 411 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), certified the following question as having great public importance: May the harmless, error rule be applied where the only penalty instruction requested is for the main offense charged and the defendant is subsequently convict…