MARIE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
MARIE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
412 So. 2d 44
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Timon, 379 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Travelers Insurance Co. v. Wilson, 371 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1980); Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Ilmonen, 360 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Butt, 296 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 308 So. 2d 114 (Fla.1975); § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jackson v. State, 736 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); J.J. v. State, 463 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); R.M. v. State, 450 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); R.D.S. v. State, 446 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); McNeil v. State, 433 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); R.M. v. State, 412 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); R.A.L. v. State, 402 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). II At first blush, it is difficult to reconcile the two lines of cases relied upon by the parties. To properly determine how the section 812.022(2) inference should operate,…
-
E.L.S. v. State, 547 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…he record. The state failed to prove that E.L.S. knew the truck in which he was riding was stolen. State v. Lewis, 364 So. 2d 1223 (Fla.1978); State v. Allen, 362 So. 2d 10 (Fla.1978); R.M. v. State, 450 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); R.M. v. State, 412 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). His unrefuted, exculpatory, and not unreasonable, explanation that the driver told him the truck belonged to the driver’s uncle from whom it had recently been stolen and to whom it had been returned precluded conviction under sec…
-
R.M. v. State, 450 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…ate failed to demonstrate that R.M. had either the requisite intent to steal the automobile or knowledge that the vehicle he was driving was stolen. State v. Lewis, 364 So. 2d 1223 (Fla.1978); State v. Allen, 362 So. 2d 10 (Fla.1978); R.M. v. State, 412 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). R.M.’s “unrefuted, exculpatory and not unreasonable explanation of his possession” of the stolen automobile— that he borrowed it from his stepfather— “rendered the state’s case ... insufficient as a matter of law to establish gui…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The Travelers Ins. Co. v. Laurence H. Wilson, 371 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Ilmonen, 360 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Merlin E. Butt, 296 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Timon, 379 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- Thermal Sys., Inc. v. Hinckley, 308 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1975)
- Schweitzer v. The City OF ST. Petersburg, 308 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1975)