FRED P. CONE ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
LAWRENCE W. RITTENOURE ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. A. B. OTTINGER ET AL., APPELLEES
FRED P. CONE ET AL., APPELLANTS,
LAWRENCE W. RITTENOURE ET AL., APPELLEES; SAME V. A. B. OTTINGER ET AL., APPELLEES
112 F.2d 167
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1940)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The questions in both of these cases are the same as those decided by this court in the two cases of Rittenoure v. Charlotte County, and Cone v. Rittenoure, 5 Cir., 109 F.2d 476, Feb. 3, 1940.
We find nothing in the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Florida contrary to said decision. Upon the authority thereof, that portion of the judgment appealed from in each case is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with our said decision of Feb. 3, 1940, 109 F.2d 476, supra.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hort v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 313 U.S. 28 (U.S. 1941)
-
Turzillo v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 346 F.2d 884 (6th Cir. 1965)
Authorities Cited
- Rittenoure v. Charlotte Cnty., 109 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1940)