THOMAS W. MURPHY, APPELLANT,
v.
KATHLEEN MARIE TALLARDY, APPELLEE
THOMAS W. MURPHY, APPELLANT,
KATHLEEN MARIE TALLARDY, APPELLEE
412 So. 2d 62
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have fully considered all of the appellate points presented and find no reversible error demonstrated. However, we do not believe it appropriate for the wife to have sole discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable visitation rights and thus we strike from the order of April 8, 1981, the portion that allows the wife the right to determine the husband’s visitation rights so that the order will grant reasonable visitation rights to the father. It would appear appropriate for the Pennsylvania Court to supervise all future matters of child custody and visitation between these parties so long as they and the children continue to reside there.
As so modified the order appealed from is affirmed.
DOWNEY, BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Murphy v. Tallardy, 422 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
-
Waugh v. Caren Waugh, 705 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…here record reveals considerable hostility between parents, renders privilege illusory; remand for trial court to specifically define father’s visitation rights as to time and place, and supervisory safeguards attendant thereto); Murphy v. Tallardy, 412 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We reverse for a more specific order stating with particularity how often and in what manner the appellant may have face-to-face visitation with his daughter, if at all. Reversed. DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and QUINCE, JJ.…
-
Savoy v. Savoy, 529 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…t agree with the appellant as to the third. Allowing visitation based on the whim or discretion of an irate adverse party — and this record reveals considerable hostility between the parents — renders that privilege illusory. See Murphy v. Tallardy, 412 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 4th DCA), petition for review denied, 419 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1982). It is represented in the appellant’s brief that, as a result of the foregoing provision in the modification order, Brenda Savoy “has not seen fit to allow (Raymond Savoy) to exe…