RED RIVER REFINING CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SUN OIL CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; PETROLEUM DERIVATIVES, INCORPORATED, OF MAINE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. SAME
RED RIVER REFINING CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
SUN OIL CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; PETROLEUM DERIVATIVES, INCORPORATED, OF MAINE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. SAME
112 F.2d 575
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1940)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
For the reasons fully and satisfactorily set forth in the opinion filed by Judge Kirkpatrick, 29 F.Supp. 636, the decree of the District Court is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Porto Rican Am. Tobacco Co. Brown v. Rican Corp., 117 F.2d 599 (2d Cir. 1941)
-
Floridin Co. v. Attapulgus Clay Co., 125 F.2d 669 (3d Cir. 1942)
-
Gen. Elec. Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co., 146 F.2d 414 (3d Cir. 1944)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence