THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
ROBERT H. ARONSON, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before the Court on Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea for Consent Judgment to violations of rule 11.02(3)(a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(a)(1), (4), (5) and (6) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. We approve the Petition, and respondent, Robert H. Ar-onson, is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year retroactive to August 3, 1978, and thereafter until he proves rehabilitation in reinstatement proceedings pursuant to rule 11.11 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar. Costs in the amount of $100.00 are hereby taxed against the respondent.
It is so ordered.
SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (72 total)
-
Beasley v. State, 774 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 2000)…rder occurred after Rodriguez had already exited the store, and the defense theory was that the murder was a spiteful act of the cofelon as an afterthought to the attempted robbery rather than an attempt to eliminate an eyewitness); Bryant v. State, 412 So. 2d 347 (Fla.1982) (holding that, where the victim was alive when the defendant left the scene and the co-felon remained with the victim, there was evidence from which a jury could conclude that the defendant had withdrawn from the criminal enterprise befor…
-
Pressley Alston v. State, 723 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1998)…it was “argumentative and [that] it’s covered by the standard jury instructions.” We find that, on this record, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying this request. See Hamilton v. State, 703 So. 2d 1038 (Fla.1997); Bryant v. State, 412 So. 2d 347 (Fla.1982). While not raised by appellant, we find that the record contains competent, substantial evidence to support the first-degree murder conviction, and we affirm the conviction. See Williams v. State, 707 So. 2d 683 (Fla.1998); Sager v. Stat…
-
Lamonda D. Giles v. State, 831 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…iateness of the self-defense instruction is not an issue on appeal. In any event, as there was evidence supporting Giles’ theory of defense, he is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law applicable to that theory of defense. Bryant v. State, 412 So. 2d 347, 350 (Fla.1982); Vazquez v. State, 518 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Finally, we cannot conclude that the erroneous instruction was harmless, as there is a reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction. State v. DiGuilio, 4…
Previewing 3 of 72 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence