JESSE LARE FERRELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Jesse Ferrell appeals his guilty plea to first degree murder and life sentence with a 25-year mandatory minimum. The court dismisses the appeal, holding that the matters Ferrell raises—primarily claims about witness credibility and ineffective assistance of counsel—cannot be addressed on appeal following a guilty plea and must instead be raised through post-trial motions in the trial court.
The claims cannot be raised on direct appeal following a guilty plea. Most matters that Ferrell complains of, including claims about witness credibility and trial counsel effectiveness, must be presented to the appellate court only after denial of post-trial motions made to the trial court.
[1] Appellate review following a guilty plea is limited to issues that can be raised on appeal after the denial of post-trial motions made to the trial court.
[2] A defendant cannot raise claims of witness perjury or ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal after a guilty plea.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the matters that can be presented on an appeal following a guilty plea are very limited and that most of them, and all of the matters of which he complains, must come to the appellate court following the denial of post-trial motions made to the trial court”
Establishes the fundamental procedural principle that limits direct appeal issues following a guilty plea conviction
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFerrell pled guilty to first degree murder under a plea bargain requiring a life sentence with a 25-year mandatory minimum. Trial defense counsel file…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.141(D) cases and more on FLexlaw
COWART, Judge.
Appellant pled guilty to first degree murder under a plea bargain that he would receive a life sentence with a 25 year mandatory1 minimum. Trial defense counsel then filed a notice of appeal and filed a statement of judicial acts to be reviewed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(d) as “Defendant-Appellant requests appeal.” The public defender was appointed and ordered a complete transcript and record, reviewed it for error, found none, and filed an Anders brief and motion to withdraw. As is customary, this court extended appellant an opportunity to himself file an additional brief. Appellant then filed a document claiming that witnesses against him lied and attacking his plea and his trial counsel. Of course, appellant, not being trained in law, does not know that the matters that can be presented on an appeal following a guilty plea are very limited and that most of them, and all of the matters of which he complains, must come to the appellate court following the denial of post-trial motions made to the trial court. See, e.g., Griffin v. State, 403 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), and cases cited therein. This is one of many such appeals that should never have been filed2 and it is
DISMISSED.
DAUKSCH, C. J., and SHARP, J., concur. . Section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1977), provides that a person convicted of a capital felony and punished by life imprisonment shall be required to serve no less than 25 years before becoming eligible for parole. The written judgment and sentence in this case did not refer to this provision of law. While the effect of the statute does not depend upon any recital in the judgment and sentence, a reference to this provision in life sentences imposed under this statute would be the better practice.
. See Lawrence v. State, 385 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lawrence v. State, 385 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Griffin v. State, 403 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)