SPRINKLE
v.
DAVIS
SPRINKLE
DAVIS
115 F.2d 625
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1941)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is the third appeal by the defendant in this case. On the two prior appeals 104 F.2d 487, and 111 F.2d 925, 128 A.L.R. 1101, he complained of the refusal of the District Court to direct a verdict in his favor and of divers other rulings. On account of the other rulings the judgment was each time reversed, but on each occasion 'we held that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury.
The evidence on the third trial leads to the same conclusion, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Davis, 127 F.2d 780 (4th Cir. 1942)
-
Sprinkle v. Davis, 117 F.2d 938 (4th Cir. 1941)
Authorities Cited
- Sprinkle v. Davis, 111 F.2d 925 (4th Cir. 1940)
- Sprinkle v. Davis, 104 F.2d 487 (4th Cir. 1939)