ELDRIDGE LEE CEPHAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ELDRIDGE LEE CEPHAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
412 So. 2d 935
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s probation was revoked for (1) failure to submit monthly supervision fees and (2) failure to make three monthly reports. The record is void of any finding concerning solvency as required in Peterson v. State, 384 So. 2d 965 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). But there is substantial evidence to support the revocation for failure to submit monthly reports. Accordingly, we strike the count which pertains to failure to submit monthly supervision fees. We affirm appellant’s revocation on the remaining count.
SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edwards v. State, 444 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…rom the revocation order the finding that appellant violated condition two of his probation which required him to pay the cost of supervision since no evidence was presented showing that he had the ability to make such payments. See Cephas v. State, 412 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Deason v. State, 404 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.…
-
Rodriguez v. State, 442 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…to remain at liberty without violating any law, to wit: obstruction by false information. We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation on the remaining findings of violation. Wienke v. State, 412 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Cephas v. State, 412 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Peterson v. State, 384 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)