ENGINEERED DISPOSAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
F. W. WOOLWORTH CO., A NEW YORK CORPORATION AND ALBERTHA MILLER, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-04-20
No. 81-1905
Before HENDRY, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
412 So. 2d 947 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190(a); Charles Poe Masonry, Inc. v. Springlock Scaffolding Rental Equipment Co., 374 So. 2d 487 (Fla.1979); University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. Stewart, 272 So. 2d 507 (Fla.1973); Allen v. Town of Largo, 39 So. 2d 549 (Fla.1949); Jemco, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 400 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Pletts v. Pletts, 258 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • King-Coleman v. Geathers, 795 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …y of proceedings under the Act should make findings that the soldier’s ability to defend is not materially affected by military service and that in the absence of such findings entry of judgment against the serviceman is improper.” Coburn v. Coburn, 412 So. 2d 947, 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (citation omitted). Additionally, “unless the trial court expressly finds as a matter of discretion that the serviceman is not hampered by his absence, and such findings are supported by the record, then postponement is manda…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw