JOHN D. PATRICK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1982-05-05
No. 81-1325
SCHEB, C. J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.
413 So. 2d 474 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in imposing multiple sentences for felony murder and the underlying felony, and in failing to award credit for time served from the date of arrest.


Facts & Procedural History

John Daniel Patrick was convicted of felony murder, burglary, and aggravated battery. The written sentencing order reflected credit for time served fr…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
HOBSON, Judge.

HOBSON, Judge.

A jury convicted John Daniel Patrick of felony murder, the underlying felony of burglary and aggravated battery. The court sentenced him to concurrent prison terms for the felony murder, the underlying felony and the aggravated battery. During the sentencing hearing, the court agreed to award him credit for time served from the date of his arrest, July 25, 1980. However, the written order of judgment and sentence reflects credit from August 25, 1980. Patrick contends that the court erred in sentencing him for the felony murder and the underlying felony and in failing to award him credit for time served from the date of his original confinement. We agree with both contentions.

Section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (1981), precludes imposition of multiple sentences for felony murder and the underlying felony. State v. Hegstrom, 401 So. 2d 1343 (Fla.1981).

A court’s written order of judgment and sentence must not vary from its oral pronouncement of judgment and sentence. Cf. Gatti v. State, 324 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975) (cause remanded where the written order of judgment and sentence exceeded the sentence imposed in open court).

Accordingly, we remand the cause with directions to vacate the sentence for the underlying felony of burglary and to award credit for time served from July 25, 1980. We leave untouched the three convictions and the sentences for felony murder and aggravated battery.

REMANDED.

SCHEB, C. J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Blocker v. State, 968 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
    …ols over a written sentence. Williams, 957 So. 2d at 603 (citing Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 (Fla.2003); Justice v. State, 674 So. 2d 123, 126 (Fla.1996)); see also Finan v. State, 794 So. 2d 623, 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Patrick v. State, 413 So. 2d 474, 475 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). In many cases, this rule applies when the written sentence contains terms that were not announced in open court as reflected in the written transcript. See, e.g., Yates v. State, 429 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). It is not…
  • Alphonse v. State, 430 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
    …lant was placed on probation for a period of ten years. Under the trial court’s oral pronouncement, one ten-year probationary period was not contemplated. The written judgment and sentence must not vary from the oral pronouncement. Patrick v. State, 413 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). We affirm appellant’s convictions but remand the cause with directions to conform the written judgment to the oral pronouncement of sentence. SCHEB, Acting C.J., and SCHOON-OVER, J., concur.…
  • Shaw v. State, 467 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
    …64 days jail time for each crime. The fines as orally pronounced were also imposed as a condition of probation. A court’s written order of judgment and sentence must not vary from its oral. pronouncement of judgment and sentence. Patrick v. State, 413 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Also, the written sentence for the misdemeanor is in excess of the statutory maximum. [*1088] Accordingly, we vacate the sentence for possession of a firearm with an altered or removed serial number and remand for imposition of a…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw