UNITED STATES
v.
MURPHY
PER CURIAM.
The appellant failed to show that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict of guilt as to the first, second, third, fifth, seventh and ninth counts of the indictment, any one of the offenses therein charged, except for the ninth count, alone being sufficient to support the general sentence imposed by the court. The presumption of law is that the court sentenced ror tne defendant’s guilt of the sustained counts. Pierce et al. v. United States, 252 U.S. 239, 252, 253, 40 S.Ct. 205, 64 L.Ed. 542; Evans v. United States (No. 2), 153 U. S. 608, 609, 14 S.Ct. 939, 38 L.Ed. 839; Claassen v. United States, 142 U.S. 140, 146, 147, 12 S.Ct. 169, 35 L.Ed. 966.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Troupe v. Chicago, 234 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1956)
-
Gypsum Carrier, Inc. v. Handelsman, 307 F.2d 525 (9th Cir. 1962)
-
Ballwanz v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., 319 F.2d 457 (4th Cir. 1963)
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Claassen v. United States, 142 U.S. 140 (U.S. 1891)
- Pierce v. United States, 252 U.S. 239 (U.S. 1920)
- Evans v. United States (No. 2), 153 U.S. 608 (U.S. 1894)