WAYNE RICHARD HORNE, APPELLANT,
v.
ERNEST LEE ELLIS, GEORGE JONAS, GISELE SPENCE AND INDUSTRIAL FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
WAYNE RICHARD HORNE, APPELLANT,
ERNEST LEE ELLIS, GEORGE JONAS, GISELE SPENCE AND INDUSTRIAL FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
413 So. 2d 860
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1982)
Caution
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order relating to jurisdiction over the person of the defendant. We conclude that the proof offered by the plaintiff was insufficient to authorize substituted service of 'process against the individual defendant and reverse and remand for further proceedings on the authority of Robinson v. Cornelius, 377 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Walt Disney World Co. v. Harrison, 443 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…r attendant care services obtained by her, even though not first requested, if the nature of the injury requires such nursing services and if the employer, having knowledge of the injury, failed to provide such services. City of Leesburg v. Balliet, 413 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The nature of the claimant’s injury and necessary treatment may be such as to impute knowledge of claimant’s need for attendant care services to the employer. Ibid., Silver Springs Sportswear v. Marlin, supra. There was no error…
-
Aino's Custom Slip Covers & Nationwide Ins. Co. v. DeLUCIA, 533 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…nd the deputy should reconsider this issue. Finally, the E/C challenge the award of 24-hour attendant care benefits to the spouse. As a general rule, household duties a spouse would normally provide are not compensable. City of Leesburg v. Balliet, 413 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The deputy must try to apportion the time spent so that the E/C pay [*866] only for attendant care rendered to the claimant, and not for the spouse’s performance of ordinary household duties. Sealey Mattress Co. v. Game, 466 So.…
-
Standard Blasting & Coating & Claims Ctr. v. Hayman, 476 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…returning home). She testified that he sleeps approximately 6 hours per night. Earlier cases stand for the proposition that ordinary household chores which would have been provided anyway are not compensable. See, e.g., City of Leesburg v. Balliet, 413 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The 1983 legislature amended Fla. Stat. § 440.13(2)(d) to make clear that this is its legislative intent.1 More recent cases state that the deputy must try to apportion the time so that employer/carrier pay for attendant care bu…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Robinson v. Cornelius, 377 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
- Baker v. Baker, 377 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)