UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ARMINIO SCALEGGERI ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. GIOVANNI MAGLIO ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. FORTUNATO DE GREGORI ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. OTTAVIO MAURI ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. CARLO BONATI ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. ROMANO TOMICICH ET AL., APPELLANTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ARMINIO SCALEGGERI ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. GIOVANNI MAGLIO ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. FORTUNATO DE GREGORI ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. OTTAVIO MAURI ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. CARLO BONATI ET AL., APPELLANTS; SAME V. ROMANO TOMICICH ET AL., APPELLANTS
126 F.2d 1023
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1942)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
All of the questions involved in these appeals have been fully discussed and decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Marchese v. United States, 5 Cir., 1942, 126 F. 2d 671. We find ourselves in entire agreement with the reasoning of the court in that case and with the conclusions there reached. The same conclusions upon substantially similar facts were reached by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Bersio v. United States, 4 Cir., 1941, 124 F. 2d 310. The judgments here appealed from are affirmed upon the authority of those cases.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Motto Franicevich, 465 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
Polonio v. United States, 131 F.2d 679 (9th Cir. 1942)
Authorities Cited
- Bersio v. United States, 124 F.2d 310 (4th Cir. 1941)
- Marchese v. United States, 126 F.2d 671 (5th Cir. 1942)