JOHN A. GOMBOS, APPELLANT,

v.

FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984)
  …ant to sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes (1981). The district court, on its own motion, voted to hear this cause en banc because the preliminary panel decision in this case conflicted with the court’s prior decision in Mobley v. State, 414 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). In affirming the assessment of costs against petitioner, the district court receded from Mobley. The court distinguished between attorney’s fees and “large court costs,” which the court conceded could not be assessed against an…
• Brown v. State, 427 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …ate, 415 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). . While the cited cases specifically refer to the Crimes Compensation Fund, there are other cases striking $2 costs which, while not stated, we surmise refer to costs under section 943.25. See Mobley v. State, 414 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Kimble v. State, 396 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Jones v. State, 389 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Jones v. State, 388 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).…
• Jenkins v. State, 422 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …excluding certain testimony as hearsay in the aggravated battery charge. Of its own motion, the Court voted to consider this proceeding en banc. A majority determined that the proposed opinion in this case conflicted with Mobley [*1008] v. State, 414 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), but then agreed to recede from Mobley and adopt the proposed opinion in this case. The costs issue was not presented to the trial judge. At the sentencing proceeding the judge, in open court and before Jenkins and his counsel,…

  ← 1 / 2 →