PHILLIP RAOUL KINMON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; CAROL CHESHIRE, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
[*225] PER CURIAM.
An appeal is taken by Phillip Raoul Kin-mon from his conviction by a jury for possession of marijuana in excess of one hundred pounds. Finding no error, we affirm.
Appeal is also taken by Carol Cheshire from her conviction for possession of marijuana in excess of twenty grams. We agree with the trial court that the evidence permits an inference that the marijuana, located in a bedroom of which Cheshire had joint custody and control, was in plain view, and we therefore affirm on the authority of Winchell v. State, 362 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 370 So. 2d 462 (Fla.1979).
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., specially concurs with opinion.
ANSTEAD, Judge, specially
concurring:
I agree that appellants’ convictions should be affirmed and write separately only to note that many of the issues raised on appeal by appellants were not preserved for review by proper and contemporaneous objections made at trial. Roban v. State, 384 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Lark Lynette Lambert, 444 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1983)…s Lambert v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Co., 426 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find direct conflict with Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 423 So. 2d 991 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Alvarez, 414 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Indomenico v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 388 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Wimpee, 376 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1980); and Stat…
-
NEW Hampshire Ins. Grp. v. Harbach, 439 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 1983)…motor vehicle. The district court of appeal held that the uninsured motorist statute in existence at the time this case arose prohibited this type of exclusion in an insurance contract. We find direct conflict with Allstate Insurance Co. v. Alvarez, 414 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Indomenico v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 388 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Wimpee, 376 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1980); and Stat…
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 425 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)…s similar to that in the instant case: Indomenico v. State Farm, 388 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State Farm v. Wimpee, 376 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); State Farm v. Kuhn, 374 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Allstate Insurance Company v. Alvarez, 414 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); and McLellan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 366 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We agree that most of these eases appear to support the proposition that section 627.-4132 constitutes a legislative overruling of th…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Winchell v. State, 362 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Roban v. State, 384 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)