DOLPHIN
v.
STARR, POSTMASTER
DOLPHIN
STARR, POSTMASTER
130 F.2d 868
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1942)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The sole question presented to this court in this case, namely, whether the Postmaster General of the United States is an indispensable party to a suit of this nature, has been heretofore decided by this court, and the question is no longer open to dispute. We held, in Neher v. Harwood, Postmaster, etc., 9 Cir., 128 F. 2d 846, 852, that the Postmaster General was an indispensable party in an action to enjoin a postmaster from carrying into effect a “fraud” order issued by the Postmaster General under 39 U.S. C.A. § 259.
Accordingly, the order of the court below is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. Fanning, 332 U.S. 490 (U.S. 1947)
-
Carney v. United States, 163 F.2d 784 (9th Cir. 1947)
Authorities Cited
- Neher v. Harwood, 128 F.2d 846 (9th Cir. 1942)