GUARANTY UNDERWRITERS, INC.,
v.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the Securities and Exchange Commission had not issued a reviewable order, thus the petition for review was dismissed.
Guaranty Underwriters, Inc. petitioned for review of an alleged order from the SEC and sought a stay of proceedings. The SEC initiated proceedings to …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
On August 7, 1942, the Securities and Exchange Commission directed proceedings against Guaranty Underwriters, Inc., a Florida corporation, “On the Question of Revocation and Suspension of Registration' Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.” 15 U.S.C.A. § 78o. Proceedings by the Commission have been delayed from time to time by actions in both the federal and the Florida state courts.
On October 5, 1942, Guaranty Underwriters, Inc., filed here its petition for review of an alleged order of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued on August 24, 1942. On November 6, 1942, there was presented to and argued before us a motion by the petitioner for a stay order suspending all proceedings until determination of the petition for review; and a motion by respondent to dismiss the petition for review.
We are of opinion and so hold that the motion for a stay order should be and the same is hereby denied. The respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for review is granted, and the petition for review is dismissed on the ground that within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sec. 25(a), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78y(a), the Commission has not issued any reviewable order in the proceedings. Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Slaff et al.), 5 Cir., Nov. 3, 1942, 131 F. 2d 148; Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 304 U.S. 375, 58 S.Ct. 963, 82 L.Ed. 1408; Jones v. Securities and Exchange .Commission, 2 Cir., 79 F. 2d 617, certiorari denied 297 U. S. 705, 56 S.Ct. 497, 80 L.Ed. 993; Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrews, 2 Cir., 88 F. 2d 441; Resources Corporation International v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 7 Cir., 97 F. 2d 788.
The motion for a stay order is denied.
The petition for review is dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R. A. Holman & Co., Inc. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 299 F.2d 127 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
-
E. Utils. Assocs. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 162 F.2d 385 (1st Cir. 1947)
-
Guar. Underwriters, Inc. v. Johnson (two cases), 133 F.2d 54 (5th Cir. 1943)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fed. Power Comm'n v. Metro. Edison Co., 304 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1938)
- Jones v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n V. Jones, 79 F.2d 617 (2d Cir. 1935)
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Andrews, 88 F.2d 441 (2d Cir. 1937)
- Miss. Power & Light Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 131 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1942)
- Res. Corp. Int'l v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 97 F.2d 788 (7th Cir. 1938)