PRUDENCE SECURITIES CORPORATION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A taxpayer cannot deduct accrued interest on bonds owned by a corporation that also owns all of the taxpayer's stock, as this is not a true creditor-debtor relationship.
The taxpayer sought to deduct accrued interest on bonds owned by a corporation that also owned all of the taxpayer's stock. The contingencies affectin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Parent-Subsidiary Relationship cases and more on FLexlaw
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
The B bonds, accrued interest on which taxpayer seeks to deduct, are owned by a corporation which also owns all taxpayer’s stock. A corporation, ordinarily, cannot in a real sense become a creditor of one of its own incorporated departments. The situation here is substantially the same as if the taxpayer were seeking to deduct accrued interest on its own unissued bonds because it had set them aside in an envelope in its vault. While there are perhaps conceivable circumstances in which accruing interest on bonds of a wholly owned subsidiary held by its parent company might be deductible from the subsidiary’s gross income, certainly when the government chooses to assail the transaction such a deduction cannot be permitted. Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473, 60 S.Ct. 355, 84 L.Ed. 406.
But, even aside from the parent-subsidiary relation, taxpayer must lose. For here the contingencies, both in form and substance, affecting the future payment of the interest on the B bonds were such that in the taxable year no reasonable person could assume that payment would ever be likely to occur. This is not a case where the unlikelihood of payment is due to the impending bankruptcy of the debtor,2 but one where indeed only events approximating the bankruptcy of the debtor could bring about any reasonable possibility of payment of interest on the B bonds. If ever there was a case where flimsy paper transactions were put forward as a basis for avoidance of tax, this is it.3
Affirmed.
Zimmerman Steel Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 130 F. 2d 1011.
Cf. Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U.S. 445, 50 S.Ct. 202, 74 L.Ed. 538, 67 A.L.R. 1010; Lucas v. North Texas Co., 281 U.S. 11, 50 S.Ct. 184, 74 L.Ed. 668; Commissioner v. Brooklyn Radio Service Corp., 2 Cir., 79 F. 2d 833, 834; Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 125 F. 2d 512, 513.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kraft Foods Co. v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 232 F.2d 118 (2d Cir. 1956)
-
Fahs v. John W. Martin in Bankr. for Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 224 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1955)
-
Guardian Inv. Corp. v. Phinney, 253 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1958)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lucas v. Am. Code Co., Inc., 280 U.S. 445 (U.S. 1930)
- Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473 (U.S. 1940)
- Lucas v. N. Tex. Lumber Co., 281 U.S. 11 (U.S. 1930)
- Zimmerman Steel Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 130 F.2d 1011 (8th Cir. 1942)
- Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 125 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1942)
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Brooklyn Radio Serv. Corp., 79 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1935)