LEWIS WOOD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Lewis Wood was indicted for breaking and entering a corn crib at night with intent to steal corn valued at six dollars. The Florida Supreme Court reversed his conviction, holding that the indictment was defective because stealing property worth six dollars constitutes only a misdemeanor, not a felony, and because a corn crib is not necessarily a 'building, ship or vessel' as required by the burglary statute.
The Court held that the indictment was defective and arrested judgment. The intent to commit larceny of six dollars worth of property is not the intent to commit a felony as required by the burglary statute, and a corn crib is not necessarily a 'building, ship or vessel' within the meaning of the statute.
“Whoever breaks and enters, in the night time, a building, ship or vessel with the intent to commit the crime of murder, rape, robbery, larceny or other felony, shall be punished”
The burglary statute requiring breaking and entering a specified structure with felonious intent
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLewis Wood was charged with breaking and entering a corn crib belonging to James A. Taylor at night on March 29, 1881, in Columbia County, with intent…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Felony Vs. Misdemeanor Classification cases and more on FLexlaw
delivered the opinion of the court.
The indictment charges that Lewis Wood unlawfully, in the night time of the 29th day of March, 1881, in the county of Columbia, “ into the corn crib there situate of James A. Taylor, wilfully, maliciously, forcibly, feloniously and burglariously did break and enter with intent then and there the goods, chattels and valuable property of the said James A. Taylor, in the said corn crib then and there being, then and there feloniously, wilfully and burglariously to steal, take and carry away, and then and there in the said corn crib six bushels of corn, of the value of six dollars, of the goods and chattels of the said James A. Taylor, in said corn crib then and there being found, then and there feloniously and burglariously did'steal, take and carry away, contrary to the form of the statute,” &c.
*968On this indictment the defendant was found guilty, and his counsel moved in arrest of judgment, which motion was overruled. The case is here on writ of error.
The errors assigned are as follows:
I. The indictment fails to charge a breaking and entering with intent to commit a larceny that amounts to a felony.
II. The indictment does not charge the breaking and entering a building.
III. The indictment does not charge an offence of which the Circuit Court has jurisdiction.
The statute, Chap. 1637, Laws 1868, sub-Chap. 4, Sec. 12, is the one under which this indictment must have been found, and it' reads as follows : “ "Whoever breaks and enters, in the night time, a building, ship or vessel with the intent to commit the crime of murder, rape, robbery, larceny or other felony, shall be punished,” &c. This section clearly implies that the crime which is intended to be committed must be a felony.
A felony by the laws of Florida,' sub-chapter 2, Chapter 1637, is a crime punishable by death or imprisonment in the State Penitentiary. Chapter 1693, Laws of 1869, Section one, reads as follows : “ That whoever is convicted of stealing property not exceeding in value twenty dollars shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than one hundred dollars, or to be imprisoned in the county jail not more than sixty days, or by both fine and imprisonment, the fine not to exceed one hundred dollars, and the imprisonment not to exceed sixty days, at the discretion of the court.” The crime of which the accused was charged was breaking and entering with intent to steal and carry away six bushels of corn of the value of six dollars. This is made a misdemeanor, and cannot be tortured into a felony. *969In the case of the People vs. Murray, 8 Cal. R., 519, the court in their opinion say: “ It is clear from the fact that all the offences specified in the fifty-eighth section can be nothing but felonies, (except the crime of larceny) and from the further fact that the expression ‘ or other felony’ is used immediately after ‘ larceny,’ that the Legislature intended that the intent to commit a felony must exist in the mind of the prisoner to make the offence complete. * ' * ' * The language of the Legislature .is too clear, under the well known rules of construction applicable to criminal statutes, to admit of doubt. It is true that under the construction we are compelled to give the statute, the breaking and entering a dwelling-house with intent to commit petit larceny, maj'- be no statutory offence. But this is an omission which must be provided for by the Legislature.”
The indictment is further defective in that it does not charge the breaking and entering a “ building, ship or vessel.” The breaking and entering is alleged to have been into a “ corn-crib,” not a building called a corn-crib. We have been unable to find this word “ corn-crib” in Worcester’s Dictionary, and it is not necessarily a “ building, ship or vessel.” Corn is defined to be a cereal grain, and the word is commonly used in this country in place of Indian corn or maize. Crib has various definitions, as the manger of a stable, a bin, a frame for a child’s bed, a small habitation, and is used in the latter sense by Shakespeare:
“Why rather, sleep, liest thou in smoky cribs Than in the perfumed chambers of the great ?”
No where else do we find it used in the sense of a building. The indictment is defective and judgment is arrested.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tilly v. State, 21 Fla. 242 (Fla. 1885)
-
Nesby Lawrence Gibbs v. Mayo, 81 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 1955)…olved in his favor. Watson v. Stone, 148 Fla. 516, 4 So. 2d 700, 701. And when a word is substituted for that used in the statute, the substituted word must necessarily be within the terms of the statute in order to charge an offense. Wood v. State, 18 Fla. 967. In accordance with this rule, we have held that an indictment for the breaking and entering of a corn-crib charges no offense because a corn-crib “is not necessarily a ‘building, ship or vessel.’ ” (Emphasis supplied.) Wood v. State, supra, at page…
-
Catanese v. State, 251 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…olved in his favor. Watson v. Stone, 148 Fla. 516, 4 So. 2d 700, 701. And when a word is substituted for that used in the statute, the substituted word must necessarily be within the terms of the statute in order to charge an offense. Wood v. State, 18 Fla. 967. * * * ” The judgment and sentence are severally vacated and this cause remanded to the trial court with directions to enter its order dismissing Count IV of the information as legally insufficient to state a crime. This procedure will permit the s…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence