LEVY
v.
LEVY ET AL.

D.C. Cir. | 1943-05-10
No. 8379
Before EDGERTON and ARNOLD, .Associate Justices, and EICHER, Chief Justice of the District Court of the United .States for the District of Columbia.
135 F.2d 663 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1943) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 73(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, requires that a notice of appeal “designate •the judgment or part thereof appealed from.” Appellants wholly failed to comply -with this requirement. In some cases this would be a formal and not necessarily fatal . defect.1 But in this case orders of various sorts were entered at various times, and the -defect makes it impossible to decide either whether the appeal is timely or whether -it is from an appealable order. Since the .appeal, in any view, is without merit, it would be gratuitous to make assumptions in order to find that it is properly before us.

Appeal dismissed.

Cf. Shannon v. Retail Clerks International Protective Ass’n, 7 Cir., 128 F. 2d 553; Rosenberg v. Union Trust Co. of Rochester, 259 N.Y. 123, 181 N.E. 71.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw