JIMMY CHARLES DANIELS A/K/A JIMMY CHARLES DANIEL, SR., A/K/A JIMMIE CHARLES DANIEL, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Tascano v. State, 393 So. 2d 540 (Fla.1980) and Murray v. State, 403 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1981). By these decisions the Supreme Court has apparently ruled that no matter how overwhelming the evidence may be, failure to give a requested instruction on the penalties for the crimes charged constitutes reversible error. We make no rulings on the other issues raised by appellant, none of which were properly presented in the trial court, and all of which may become moot or the subject of a subsequent plenary appeal.
DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (30 total)
-
Justice v. State, 674 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1996)…DCA 1993) (holding that trial court’s oral pronouncement that defendant would receive credit for time served since arrest controlled over re-sentencing form which erroneously credited him with only partial time served since arrest); Kelly v. State, 414 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (holding that mandatory minimum sentence orally pronounced but not incorporated in written sentence was valid part of sentence because written sentence is merely record of actual sentence pronounced in open court). Some cases ha…
-
Wolfson v. State, 437 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…ule extends the time until sixty days after receipt of the appellate mandate. However, the appeal itself removes jurisdiction from the trial judge, thereby eliminating his authority to change the sentence while the appeal is pending. Kelly v. State, 414 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); see Smith v. State, 407 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), pet. for rev. denied, 417 So. 2d 330 (Fla.1982). Since appellant’s convictions were on appeal to this court on the date the probation order was entered and we had not relin…
-
Vasquez v. State, 663 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…or other final disposition “shall be pronounced in open court.” See generally Olvey v. State, 609 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The written sentence is considered merely a record of the actual sentence pronounced in open court. See Kelly v. State, 414 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Our supreme court has never directly ruled on the issue of whether Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700 mandates oral pronouncement of conditions of probation. Nonetheless, application of the mandatory dictates of rule 3.70…
Previewing 3 of 30 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tascano v. State, 393 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1980)
- Murray v. State, 403 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1981)